Solution
Reviews, directories, registries and forums each protect differently. One endpoint covers them, with per-type success data before you promise a dataset.
Who this is for
Alternative-data funds, consultancies, brand-insight teams, academic research groups and social-listening vendors. A project has a fixed question and a fixed deadline, and the sources are whatever answers it: reviews, job boards, directories, forums, registries. Nobody on the team is going to build bespoke challenge handling per source.
The problem
Every source brings a different protection stack, so adding the tenth costs about what the first did. Worse, the team has to promise a dataset before it knows the dataset is collectable, and one unsolvable source turns a delivered analysis into a caveat. What they need is per-type success data up front, not a discovery process that runs against the deadline.
Works with
[ 04 ]Questions about this one
Run that type against the free test allowance first. Each type page publishes its measured success rate and P95, so a pilot of a few hundred solves tells you what the full run will look like.
Yes. GeeTest, Tencent, NetEase Yidun and the generic slider, click and rotate types sit under the same key as reCAPTCHA and Turnstile.
No subscription and no seat licence. You pay per solve, so a three-week study costs what it actually solves.
Issue a key per project rather than per person. Usage is reported per key, which is also how you bill a study back to a client.
Create a key, paste it into the sample above, and watch a real token come back. No card, no sales call.
